UPDATED: 09-09-25 07:22 PDT

men UMass 1
  
UMass                 
W-L: ( 9- 6) PR = 93.4630

Schedule/Results All Games

Date Opponent Conf/State (W-L, PR) Score 208 H Army Patriot (12- 2, 97.9) 9-16 214 H Quinnipiac MAAC ( 3-12, 88.2) 19- 5 218 H Dartmouth Ivy ( 8- 5, 94.5) 11- 7 222 H NJIT America East ( 1-11, 86.5) 12- 4 301 A Albany America East ( 7- 8, 93.2) 10- 9 308 A Vermont America East ( 5- 7, 91.5) 11- 7 315 A Rutgers B1G ( 7- 9, 95.0) 11- 7 318 A Mass-Lowell America East ( 4- 9, 88.5) 10- 9 322 H Brown Ivy ( 3-10, 93.0) 7- 8 329 A St Josephs Atlantic 10 ( 9- 6, 95.0) 11-10 405 H High Point Atlantic 10 ( 7- 9, 93.0) 9-14 412 H St B'venture Atlantic 10 ( 6-10, 89.0) 15- 4 419 A Richmond Atlantic 10 (13- 3, 97.4) 5-14 425 H Hobart Atlantic 10 ( 5- 9, 91.3) 15-16 501 N Richmond Atlantic 10 (13- 3, 97.4) 4-14

PREDICTION LIST

               -------------------------------------
               |Real   = actual goal margin        |
               |Pred   = predicted goal margin     |
               |+      = slightly above prediction |
               |++     = above prediction          |
               |+++    = well above prediction     |
               |-      = slightly below prediction |
               |--     = below prediction          |
               |---    = well below prediction     |
               |Goals* = Goals over (+) under (-)  |
               |         prediction. N/A when ten  |
               |         goal limit is exceeded    |
               |n/a    = Outside division          |
               -------------------------------------


   Date  Opponent               Score     Real Pred    +/-   Goals*
   208 H Army                    9-16      -7    -4          -1.40
   214 H Quinnipiac             19- 5      14     6           0.00
   218 H Dartmouth              11- 7       4     0    ++     4.19
   222 H NJIT                   12- 4       8     8           0.00
   301 A Albany                 10- 9       1    -1           1.62
   308 A Vermont                11- 7       4     1    +      2.87
   315 A Rutgers                11- 7       4    -2    +++    6.36
   318 A Mass-Lowell            10- 9       1     4    -     -3.11
   322 H Brown                   7- 8      -1     1    -     -2.30
   329 A St Josephs             11-10       1    -2    +      3.44
   405 H High Point              9-14      -5     1    ---   -6.36
   412 H St B'venture           15- 4      11     5           0.00
   419 A Richmond                5-14      -9    -5          -0.22
   425 H Hobart                 15-16      -1     3    --    -4.02
   501 N Richmond                4-14     -10    -4          -1.08

UNDER-ACHIEVED GAMES

   Date  Opponent               Score     Real Pred    +/-   Goals*
   405 H High Point              9-14      -5     1    ---   -6.36
   425 H Hobart                 15-16      -1     3    --    -4.02
   318 A Mass-Lowell            10- 9       1     4    -     -3.11
   322 H Brown                   7- 8      -1     1    -     -2.30

OVER-ACHIEVED GAMES

   Date  Opponent               Score     Real Pred    +/-   Goals*
   315 A Rutgers                11- 7       4    -2    +++    6.36
   218 H Dartmouth              11- 7       4     0    ++     4.19
   308 A Vermont                11- 7       4     1    +      2.87
   329 A St Josephs             11-10       1    -2    +      3.44

UMass Evaluation

The team that earns the point in the pair-wise comparison is based on three criteria: 
first is head-to-head, the winner gets the point, however, if they did not play each
other, than it considers w-l versus common opponents. If their records are tied or they
have no common opponents, than the tie-breaker becomes the better power rating.
The Common Opponent Point list in the table below has the record of the winner followed by the
record of the loser for all common opponents
Opponent Who Gets
the Point?
Head-2-Head
Point
Common Opponent
Point
Power Rating
Point
Air Force UMass tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) UMass
Albany UMass UMass  
Army Army Army  
Bellarmine UMass tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) UMass
Binghamton UMass insuffient: ( 5- 0)( 4- 1) UMass
Boston Univ Boston Univ Boston Univ   2- 0 vs 0- 2
Brown Brown Brown  
Bryant UMass insuffient: ( 5- 1)( 4- 2) UMass
Bucknell UMass insuffient: ( 2- 2)( 1- 3) UMass
Canisius UMass insuffient: ( 2- 1)( 1- 2) UMass
Cleveland St UMass insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) UMass
Colgate Colgate tied - ( 1- 1) ( 1- 1) Colgate
Cornell Cornell Cornell   5- 0 vs 2- 3
Dartmouth UMass UMass  
Delaware UMass insuffient: ( 0- 1)( 1- 0) UMass
Denver Denver tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) Denver
Detroit UMass   UMass
Drexel UMass UMass   3- 0 vs 1- 2
Duke Duke insuffient: ( 1- 1)( 2- 0) Duke
Fairfield Fairfield insuffient: ( 1- 1)( 2- 0) Fairfield
Georgetown Georgetown Georgetown   3- 1 vs 1- 3
Hampton UMass   UMass
Harvard Harvard insuffient: ( 1- 1)( 2- 0) Harvard
High Point High Point High Point  
Hobart Hobart Hobart  
Hofstra UMass   UMass
Holy Cross UMass insuffient: ( 2- 1)( 1- 2) UMass
Iona UMass tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) UMass
Jacksonville UMass insuffient: ( 0- 1)( 1- 0) UMass
JHU JHU insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) JHU
Lafayette Lafayette tied - ( 1- 1) ( 1- 1) Lafayette
Le Moyne UMass tied - ( 1- 1) ( 1- 1) UMass
Lehigh Lehigh insuffient: ( 1- 2)( 0- 3) Lehigh
LIU UMass insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) UMass
Loyola UMass insuffient: ( 1- 1)( 0- 2) UMass
Manhattan UMass insuffient: ( 2- 0)( 1- 1) UMass
Marist UMass insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) UMass
Marquette Marquette   Marquette
Maryland Maryland tied - ( 1- 1) ( 1- 1) Maryland
Mass-Lowell UMass UMass  
Mercer UMass insuffient: ( 1- 1)( 0- 2) UMass
Mercyhurst UMass UMass   2- 1 vs 0- 3
Merrimack UMass insuffient: ( 2- 0)( 1- 1) UMass
Michigan Michigan insuffient: ( 1- 1)( 2- 0) Michigan
Monmouth UMass insuffient: ( 2- 0)( 1- 1) UMass
Mt St Marys UMass UMass   2- 0 vs 0- 2
Navy Navy insuffient: ( 0- 2)( 1- 1) Navy
NJIT UMass UMass  
No Carolina No Carolina insuffient: ( 0- 2)( 1- 1) No Carolina
Notre Dame Notre Dame   Notre Dame
Ohio State Ohio State tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) Ohio State
Penn Penn insuffient: ( 3- 1)( 2- 2) Penn
Penn State Penn State tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) Penn State
Princeton Princeton insuffient: ( 3- 1)( 4- 0) Princeton
Providence Providence insuffient: ( 1- 1)( 0- 2) Providence
Queens UMass tied - ( 1- 1) ( 1- 1) UMass
Quinnipiac UMass UMass  
Richmond Richmond Richmond  
Rob Morris UMass insuffient: ( 1- 3)( 2- 2) UMass
Rutgers UMass UMass  
Sacred Heart UMass tied - ( 2- 0) ( 2- 0) UMass
Siena Siena insuffient: ( 2- 0)( 1- 1) Siena
St B'venture UMass UMass  
St Johns UMass tied - ( 3- 1) ( 3- 1) UMass
St Josephs UMass UMass  
Stony Brook UMass tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) UMass
Syracuse Syracuse tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) Syracuse
Towson Towson insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) Towson
UMBC UMass tied - ( 4- 1) ( 4- 1) UMass
Utah UMass UMass   2- 0 vs 0- 2
Vermont UMass UMass  
Villanova Villanova tied - ( 1- 1) ( 1- 1) Villanova
Virginia Virginia insuffient: ( 1- 2)( 2- 1) Virginia
VMI UMass tied - ( 1- 1) ( 1- 1) UMass
Wagner UMass UMass   2- 0 vs 0- 2
Yale Yale tied - ( 2- 2) ( 2- 2) Yale

PowerWise = 43


division Games Only
Average number of games used in Games Correction = 14.34

 Date  Opponent          (W-L  PR)      SCORE       SAFE        SAFE       Home       No Games           SCI              
                                                    Loss        Win       Field      Correction         Points            
                                                    SLP         SWP     Advantage      Factor                       
                                                      
   0 H Army            (12- 2, 97.9)     9-16       -1.98      16.84      -0.86         0.96            -2.71
   0 H Quinnipiac      ( 3-12, 88.2)    19- 5      -11.72       7.09      -0.86         0.96             5.96
   0 H Dartmouth       ( 8- 5, 94.5)    11- 7       -5.39      13.43      -0.86         0.96            12.01
   0 H NJIT            ( 1-11, 86.5)    12- 4      -13.43       5.38      -0.86         0.96             4.33
   0 A Albany          ( 7- 8, 93.2)    10- 9       -6.67      12.14       0.86         0.96            12.43
   0 A Vermont         ( 5- 7, 91.5)    11- 7       -8.42      10.39       0.86         0.96            10.75
   0 A Rutgers         ( 7- 9, 95.0)    11- 7       -4.93      13.88       0.86         0.96            14.09
   0 A Mass-Lowell     ( 4- 9, 88.5)    10- 9      -11.40       7.41       0.86         0.96             7.90
   0 H Brown           ( 3-10, 93.0)     7- 8       -6.88      11.94      -0.86         0.96            -7.39
   0 A St Josephs      ( 9- 6, 95.0)    11-10       -4.86      13.96       0.86         0.96            14.16
   0 H High Point      ( 7- 9, 93.0)     9-14       -6.94      11.87      -0.86         0.96            -7.45
   0 H St B'venture    ( 6-10, 89.0)    15- 4      -10.87       7.94      -0.86         0.96             6.77
   0 A Richmond        (13- 3, 97.4)     5-14       -2.52      16.29       0.86         0.96            -1.59
   0 H Hobart          ( 5- 9, 91.3)    15-16       -8.59      10.22      -0.86         0.96            -9.04
   0 N Richmond        (13- 3, 97.4)     4-14       -2.52      16.29      -0.00         0.96            -2.41
                                                                                                        ------
                                                                                                        57.81

winning pts = 88.3969 losing points = -30.5880

             SCI ={(SLP or SLW) +/- home-field advantage} * Game Correction.

------------------------------------------------------------------------
| (W-L PR) = Won-loss record and power rating |
| SCORE = game score |
| SAFE Loss (SLP) = Points deducted for losing to the opponent |
| SAFE Win (SWP) = Points awarded for defeating the opponent |
| Home-field Advantage = goals deducted/awarded for site |
| No games correction = normalzation based on a ~16 game schedule |
------------------------------------------------------------------------